原文 Source Text
J:你之前接觸過摘要寫作嗎? 1-2 經過課堂的學習後,現在你對它的了解為何?
A:我之前幾乎很少寫作,我覺得一開始的提綱是比較簡單的步驟。
B:我覺得剛開始接觸的時候比較困難,之後就越來越簡單
J:你們在團體的摘要寫作練習中,如何討論和修改? 你們覺得優點是甚麼?
A:我們一開始會先跟彼此討論這段的看法,而後再去做修改比較模糊的部分,我覺得優點的部分是可以直接面對面討論或是交換意見,而且這樣的活動也可以提升彼此的能力
B:我覺得優點是可以大家面對面的討論或是意見的交換,我覺得缺點是不能做全面性的修改。
J:有關wiki 的部分和傳統紙本的摘要寫作練習,你們喜歡哪一種?它們的優缺點是甚麼?
A:我比較喜歡寫在紙上,不過寫在紙上的話思考的時間比較久,但可以比較仔細,WIKI的話則是可以上傳(參考)看。
B:我比較較喜歡寫在紙,而WIKI則是可以互相看
J:第一階段的互相修改對方有什麼優缺點,大概要花多少時間看對方文章?
A:第一階段是我跟Rachel,我覺得對方對於拼字以及邊點符號的應用是比較弱的方面的,而我自己則是在格式以及時態的方面需要改進,我大概要花10分鐘的時間去看對方的文章。
B:我第一階段是跟Judy,我覺得對方的優點是,文章 GMfood,facebook都有用自己的話來寫作。而對方的缺點則是句子沒有改善,我大概需要10分鐘的時間看對方的文章。
J:可以舉出我們在摘要練習中Lady gaga, Dictionary, teenager這三篇文章中
最簡單和最困難的文章嗎?為甚麼?
J:哪一篇比較簡單?
A:我覺得ladygaga這一篇比較簡單
B:我覺得是dictionary比較簡單
J:那對於你們哪一篇較難?
A:我認為是teenager,因為作者自己的那一段故事是難懂的。
B:我覺得是ladygaga,因為不了解背景
J:在兩人交換批閱的wiki摘要練習中,你覺得對方最嚴重的問題是甚麼?
A:如玢的句子與原文很相似。
B:俊昇的時態比較弱,而且句子結構很難一致
J:WIKI跟傳統的方法試做比較,你們覺得哪一個比較好
A:WIKI是比較清楚、較好改,但是也因為這樣容易出現互抄的情形,而傳統得方法是比較耗費時間,但是寫出來的東西會有比較多的修飾以及想法。
B:WIKI較清楚,而傳統的方式必須多花一點時間才可以,也必須想久的一點。
J:建議wiki摘要練習有何需要加強之處? 會推薦給學弟妹嗎?
A:面對面的討論可以再多一點,
A:我建議用短的文章較好做摘要,新聞性及新知的文章會比較喜歡。
B:我覺得利用短的文章會較好
譯文 Target Text
J: Have you ever learned Summary Writing(摘要寫作)? What do you think about it after learning it in class?
A:I had rarely done writing exercise before; I feel the outline at the beginning is the relatively simple part.
B:I think it was difficult as learning it first, but later it became much simple.
J: How did you discuss and modify when you practiced Summary Writing in group? What are the advantages you consider?
A:At first, we would discuss certain paragraph together and modify the indistinct part. I feel the advantage is that we could discuss directly and exchange the opinions face to face. Besides, this kind of activity can also improve mutual abilities.
B:I also think the advantage is that everyone could discuss directly and exchange the opinions face to face. However, the disadvantage is that we could not do complete modifying.
J: Which Summary Writing exercise do you like the best, Wiki or traditional paper? What are the advantages and disadvantages of them?
A:I would rather write on the paper, but it took me lots of time to think. As for Wiki, it is better that we can upload it and take look mutual exercises.
B:I would rather write on the paper, and Wiki can let us take look mutual exercises.
J: What the advantages and disadvantages of the first stage letting you modify mutual summary? How much time did you spend to look the other article?
A:At the first stage were Rachel and me. I think the other is relatively weak for spelling and applying of punctuations. As for me, I should improve the structure and tense. I spend about ten minutes looking the other article.
B:At the first stage were Judy and me. I think the other advantage is that she used her own words to write GM Food and Facebook articles.
J: Could you mention the simplest and the most difficult one among three articles like Lady gaga, Dictionary, Teenager we had practiced early? Why?
J: Which one is much easier?
A:I think it is the Lady gaga.
B:I think it is the Dictionary.
J: Which one is rather difficult for you?
A:I think it is Teenager, because the part of author’s story is hard to understand.
B:I feel it is Lady gaga, because I don’t know the background information.
J: What is the most serious part you think the other having when you exchange mutual articles to modify for the Wiki Summary Writing?
A:B’s sentences are similar with the original text.
B:A’s tense is weak and the sentence structure is not coherent.
J: Which is the better one, Wiki or traditional method?
A:Wiki is clear and easy to modify. However, just due to this reason, it is much possible to appear the situation that everyone copy mutual articles. On the contrary, although traditional way took more time, the essay coming out was modified correctly and filled with more ideas.
B:Wiki is much clear. We has to think longer with the traditional way , so it took more time.
J: What suggestion can you provide to Wiki Summary Writing? Will you promote it to the lower classman?
A:It should increase more possibility for face to face discussion.
B:I suggest that it should use the shorter essay as material, so it is much appropriate for doing summary. Besides, the news and informative articles are much popular.